![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Because I know that's what a lot of people are meaning to do. Or to be able to at least kindly ask them why they like to annoy me. I'd like to be able to "meh" them back if you know what I mean. Like when people just leave the exact same review for every game they play and the fact that they make it so no one can comment on them is the ultimate annoyance. At the same time of course, there's the other "meh" reviews that get under your skin they're so annoying. I find these sometimes to be hilarious to read when they make sense. Even the "meh" reviews you speak of can sometimes be understood or explain exactly what a person experienced from a game. I take into account that all the reviews I read are from multiple personalities. What I do is read as many Steam reviews as possible for a game and base how good or bad it might(a big might) be from what I read. Thus, there are no middle ground reviews. There's no room for that scale in Steam reviews. Horace and Hello Neighbor get a whopping -10/5. Point being, Alan Wake and MGS3 I give 5/5. Inversely, something like Quantum Break might be disliked, which puts it on equal ground with straight (What I colloquially have tagged as) Fucking Garbage like Horace or Hello Neighbor. Thus I don't leave a review on Steam because then something I love like Alan Wake gets the same "score" as something mediocre, but not terrible, like Quantum Break. Not exactly something I'd recommend, but not something I'd actively tell people to avoid. I have a bunch of games that I'd leave a review for, but most of them are pretty middling. I know people give Metacritic shit, but it's at least something better to go off of with a ~70 score being a fairly average game. Any game that functions and isn't abhorrently awful will have a "positive" review aggregate on Steam. The middle ground would be Mixed reviews. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |